# Re: PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]

From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:39:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+=hbbe00LLve4Ytqtvvde0od5WrscutrYzbjXP57TmN9XWvew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
The editors agree with this comment.

The proposed resolution is to add the constraint
IF hadMember(d, e) and 'Dictionary' \in typeOf(d) THEN
hadDictionaryMember(d, e, "k") with k and unknown key
to PROV-Dictionary.

If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to
inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before
Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted,

- Tom

2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

> PROV-ISSUE-642 (TomDN): Include example of provenance of a dictionary in
> the document [PROV-DICTIONARY]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/642
>
> Raised by: Tom De Nies
> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY
>
> Originally raised by Paul, who would like to see a small example of the
> provenance of a dictionary in the document to illustrate the spec. We
> should do this by the final release.
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 12:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:32 UTC