W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:06:24 +0000
To: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0EE6F63D-F6CE-4DA1-96A5-FF88A3378292@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
+1

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom


On 22 Mar 2013, at 12:31, "Tom De Nies" <tom.denies@ugent.be<mailto:tom.denies@ugent.be>> wrote:

Hello all,

the proposal to resolve this issue is to add the prefix "prov:" to all the prov-n dictionary notations, analogous to what was done for PROV-Links.
This would make the extension valid.

If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to  inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted,

- Tom


2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org<mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>>
PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/640

Raised by: Tom De Nies
On product: PROV-DICTIONARY

Originally raised by Luc and Stian in their review, but was considered non-blocking after adding a remark to the document. For the next draft, we need to resolve this.

http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-n/#extensibility  states: the predicate MUST be a qualifiedName with a non-empty prefix. However, we will be using the prov namespace. How do we proceed?
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 13:08:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:32 UTC