W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Internal Review Prov Dictionary

From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:49:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+=hbbfAdSzYZzd2HeG9ffRp_bfAUAyNMu5k49Ae9Ks+A-KgNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
Cc: Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Simon, yes,
I forgot to reset the date to the current date.
The Editor's draft is the document to review.

- Tom


2013/3/29 Miles, Simon <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>

> Hello Sam,
>
> Can I check I'm looking at the right document, before I review it?
>
> I guess the document is the one at the URL below, but it is dated 12 March
> 2013. Is this just because the date is not updated yet?
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/Overview.html
>
> thanks,
> Simon
>
> Dr Simon Miles
> Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
> Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
> +44 (0)20 7848 1166
>
> Evolutionary Testing of Autonomous Software Agents:
> http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1370/
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Sam Coppens Ugent [sam.coppens@ugent.be]
> Sent: 29 March 2013 16:21
> To: Provenance Working Group
> Subject: Internal Review Prov Dictionary
>
> Hello Everybody,
>
> The provenance dictionary is updated and ready for internal review (also
> the OWL schema and the XML schema of prov:Dictionary)
> Note that there are still three open issues on the tracker:
> https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/19
> Two of these are editorial, and will be handled next week.
> - The CSS issue will be fixed once I know the proper way to include the
> production rules
> - The lay-out is being improved as we go through the document.
>
> The example is not finished yet. This will be included as an extra
> section at the end of the document, and will have one clear example
> illustrating the use of hadDictionaryMember, insertion, removal and
> insertion with update semantics. We will ask for review of this example
> separately. In the meantime, the rest of the document can be reviewed.
>
> The deadline for the review is April 4th, the final vote April 17th.
> This way we can incorporate all the remarks of the reviews.
>
> Thanks for your patience!
> And have a nice weekend,
>
> Tom & Sam
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 11:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:33 UTC