Re: PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary [PROV-DICTIONARY]

Hello all,

the proposal to resolve this issue is to add the prefix "prov:" to all the
prov-n dictionary notations, analogous to what was done for PROV-Links.
This would make the extension valid.

If any members of the WG have an objection to this, we ask kindly to
inform us by replying to this email. If no objections are received before
Tuesday March 26th, we will assume this resolution is accepted,

- Tom


2013/3/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

> PROV-ISSUE-640 (TomDN): Namespace and prefix in PROV Dictionary
> [PROV-DICTIONARY]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/640
>
> Raised by: Tom De Nies
> On product: PROV-DICTIONARY
>
> Originally raised by Luc and Stian in their review, but was considered
> non-blocking after adding a remark to the document. For the next draft, we
> need to resolve this.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-n/#extensibility  states: the predicate MUST be
> a qualifiedName with a non-empty prefix. However, we will be using the prov
> namespace. How do we proceed?
>
>
>
>