ACTION-147: Write something for option a) of rdf conversion, plus XSLT
[ACTION-135] specialRequirements flesh out
ACTION-143 text proposal for local elements within text
[All] tracking data category progress
MLW-LT WG call minutes 2012-06-28
gotomeeting info
Can't make today's Conf call
[All] call for a scribe for today
[ISSUE-22] Provenance and agents
[ISSUE-3] Call for consensus on "ontology for metadata values in namedEntity"
[ISSUE 12] Segmentation Markup System
[All] AGENDA MLW-LT Call 28 June, 2 p.m. UTC
BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
- Re: BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
- Re: BCP 47 "t" extension follow up and locale identifier definition
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-32 (ruby-model): Ruby model [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
[All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- RE: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
- Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
[All] ITS 2.0: next steps by 15 July and for September f2f meeting
Query on ISO-Cat/DCR
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-31 (CURIES-not-needed): CURIES are not needed
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-30 (Maxime): yes and no, true and false ... [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
[ACTION-123]
[ACTION-120] Jirka to make a clarification in the req draft about previous versions of HTML
[ACTION-121] Jirka to summarize usage of Ruby in DocBook
[all] Call for FEISGILTT 2012 Program Committee Participation
regrets for telco
MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-29 (Maxime): Please comment the possible solutions for HTML+ITS2.0 to HTML (and | embedded by | embedding) RDF
Terminology merging ? (Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday)
[all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 21st June 2012, 2pm UTC
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-28 (Maxime): What are the type of node that may be selected in global rules ?
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-28 (Maxime): What are the type of node that may be selected in global rules ?
[All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
- Re: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday
ISSUE-27: Local withinText implementation
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-27 (local-within-text): Local Element within text [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 25/06/2012)
[All] please don't send "orphan" mails
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-26 (post-editing-related-datacats): Post editing related datacats [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-25 (dublin-core-existing-metadata-fields): Existing metadata fields in Dublin core [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-24 (its-term-change-proposal): Proposal to change ITS term [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
Note on its:term
QA errors - "active" flag
Example for "domain" data category - how to map domain information
ITS proposed data categories and the Dublin Core
ITS Project Information proposed data categories and the Dublin Core
ISSUE 9: idValue
[ISSUE 20] RE: [all] please provide update on your actions in this thread
ISSUE-20 ACTION-102 Resolution of global usage of ITS in HTML5
[all] please provide update on your actions in this thread
Update: MLW workshop Dublin Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday)
ISSUE-22: Provenance, and the W3C PROV-XG
Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
- Re: Links vs. identifiers (Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies))
MLW workshop Dublin: Overview of issues to be discussed on 12-13 June (Tuesday-Wednesday)
REMINDER (Re: [All] IMPORTANT: feedback about ITS 2.0 implementation plans by 10 June)
RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology
ITS 2 namespace URI
ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
- Re: ISSUE 16: parameters for rules
Come to META-FORUM 2012
[all] actions from 31 May call
ACTION-99: Clarify Issue 14
[all] future scribes, please volunteer
Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)
- RE: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies)