RE: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa. from Jan Nelson on 2012-06-22 (public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from June 2012)

From: Jan Nelson <Jan.Nelson@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:41:08 +0000
To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
CC: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8E3F7404816BBC46A339E2D718928ECB3001AB@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.>

I tend to agree to keep the URI unchanged, I think even though it mantains more chars, any human reading it would benefit from being able to see the complete URI path

-Jan

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Lefrançois [mailto:maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr] 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:20 AM
To: Jirka Kosek
Cc: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group
Subject: Re: MultilingualWeb-LT working group: question about CURIEs and their use outside RDFa.

> I think that we should't use CURIEs in ITS 2.0. I thinkt that most 
> datacatogies containing URI will be machine generated in practice. It 
> doesn't make sense to make processing more complex then it has to be.

Ok, anyone else has a thought about that ? should we do a poll ?

If no one else is keen to reduce verbosity (=size) of HTML + ITS 2.0 documents, and we think that URIs will always be machine generated and machine processed, let's not use CURIEs, that will lighten the rec and my job.

Maxime

Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 15:41:56 UTC