Re: Some input from EDI-TA (posteding methodology research)

Thanks, Pedro. I added this as ISSUE-26. Like the other data category
proposals we discussed: please move this forward by

1) gathering two implementations of each feature
2) gathering consensus about the proposed features
3) issue a "call for consensus" pointing to the discussion of 1) and 2).

A question: I understand that many kinds of metadata are needed in
Linguaserve's use cases and reference implementations. What are the two or
three most important ones?

Thanks,

Felix

2012/6/13 Pedro L. Díez Orzas <pedro.diez@linguaserve.com>

> Dear all,****
>
> ** **
>
> Our people that is working in methodology and training for post-editing
> sent to me a short list of rates they are using. I do not know if they have
> any interest for ITS 2.0. They are the following:****
>
> ** **
>
> UTS Ratings (Utility, Time and Sentiment)****
>
> *Utility* (relative importance of the functionality of the translated
> content).****
>
> *Delivery Time* (*speed* with which the translation is required). ****
>
> *Sentiment* (importance on brand image).* *****
>
> *Expiration level.*
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you,****
>
> Pedro****
>
>
> __________ Información de ESET Smart Security, versión de la base de
> firmas de virus 7208 (20120609) __________
>
> ESET Smart Security ha comprobado este mensaje.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>



-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow