- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:52:35 +0200
- To: Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 12:53:06 UTC
Dear Mark, with CC to the MultilingualWeb LT and the i18n core public list, I have an action ACTION-133 to follow up on the BCP 47 discussion we had with your contribution on 12 June. Thanks again for your presentation. In our requirements document http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/ we have several requirements related to processes, see e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/#Process_Model Since the "t" extension is also meant to express process related information, we want to coordinate the values that can be used via that extension with what we define - or just refer to them. What would be the best way to achieve this? A related issue: we need to specify information about locales, see e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/#locale-filter The current thinking about locale identifiers is here http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/#Identification_of_Language_and_Local At the Dublin workshop there was already some feedback from Richard (IIRC): if we have a dedicated field for a local identifier, than a basic BCP 47 language tag (without the underscore conversion) might do it. Do you have any thoughts on this? Thanks a lot for your feedback in advance, Felix -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 12:53:06 UTC