- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:45:23 +0200
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Tadej, I realize your examples are made-up and without context, but there is one thing that I don’t understand: What the #synset_loschen_3 “selector” corresponds too? So far the ITS selector has been the expression to select the node to where the data category applies. So in the raw ITS example it seems it could point to the location of löschen in the content, but then why do we have a copy of löschen in the ITS rule? In the HTML+ITS I'm not sure if I understand why it would be needed since the markup is in the span that delimits the content to which the disambiguation applies. What am I missing? Thanks, -yves From: Tadej Štajner [mailto:tadej.stajner@ijs.si] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 2:43 PM To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org Subject: Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies) Hi, I agree with Pedro on the questions. Automatic word sense disambiguation is in practice still not perfect, so some semi-automatic user interfaces make a lot of sense. And how I think that this could look like in a made-up example, answering Felix's 1) and 2): 1) HTML+ITS: <span its-disambiguation its-semantic-network-ref="http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/lsd/index.shtml" its-selector="#synset_loschen_3">löschen</span> 2) Markup in raw ITS <its:disambiguation semanticNetworkRef="http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/lsd/index.shtml" selector="#synset_loschen_3">löschen</its:disambiguation> -- Tadej
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 13:45:49 UTC