AW: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday

Hello Felix,

I'll try to look at it tomorrow, but a three-day deadline to check and revise such a document is a bit short notice. If you have more such deadlines in mind for the future, could you provide dates for that. A list of dates would be enough for me to put in my calendar.

I think you know the W3C process more than anybody else in the consortium so it would be great if you could maybe clarify all these deadlines, how they work, what the next phase means for the draft / project and so on. I think this would also help the other LT-Web partners to understand how the process works as most of the members do not know it at all.

Cheers,
Moritz

Von: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2012 03:09
An: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Betreff: [All] ITS 2.0 first draft, please review by Thursday

Hi all,

after the great success of our workshop last week, let's go into the next round :)

See the editors copy of ITS 2.0 at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html
and, not in the editors copy, the status section at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/TR-version/#status
ITS 2.0 is based on ITS 1.0, see the changes done so far at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#revisionlog

I am sure I forgot *a lot*, but we want to get a first draft out soon, so this should be a basis. By Thursday, please reply *to this thread* and
- Let me know what to change
- Propose additions (paragraphs, sections etc.), if possible with detailed wording
I will then implement your proposals on Friday and issue a call for consensus on Monday next week, so that we can publish 28 July.

What we need from now on (not necessarily for the first publication) are:
- Test data, which serves also as examples, see e.g. http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-term-local-html-1
- Descriptions of the data categories, following the approach of the ITS 1.0 existing ones. Again, detailed wording is very much appreciated
- Detailed wordings for all our issues we resolved already, e.g. the algorithms for generating RDFa / NIF, the query language attribute etc.

Thanks a lot for your contributions in advance! A word at Arle, Dave and Jirka: I will come back to you offline about editing - as Jirka knows, the setup is based on XML, for the sake of coherence etc. But you will get used to that soon, I'm sure.

Best,

Felix

--
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow