- From: Tadej Stajner <tadej.stajner@ijs.si>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:17:21 +0200
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
On 6/22/2012 12:19 PM, Maxime Lefrançois wrote: >> I think that we should't use CURIEs in ITS 2.0. I thinkt that most >> datacatogies containing URI will be machine generated in practice. It >> doesn't make sense to make processing more complex then it has to be. > Ok, anyone else has a thought about that ? should we do a poll ? Jirka's comment makes sense. This is pretty much machine territory here. If it makes the transformation easier to implement, I'm in favor of this change. -- Tadej > If no one else is keen to reduce verbosity (=size) of HTML + ITS 2.0 documents, and we think that URIs will always be machine generated and machine processed, let's not use CURIEs, that will lighten the rec and my job. > > Maxime >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 11:17:52 UTC