- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:04:12 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 05:04:37 UTC
Hi Yves, wouldn't that need to conflicts between its:param and implementation specific parameters? E.g. http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/using-xsl/commandline.xml allows to pass parameters to XSLT, and that's just one example. Would that have precedence over its:param? Felix 2012/6/15 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> > Hi Jirka, all, > > > Implementation will be very easy for XSLT based toolchains. > > I'm not sure if all pure XPath libraries are able to > > bind parameters before evaluation. > > For Java there is a variable resolver the interface for using XPath. > > So, should we move forward with a definition for the parameters like this?: > > <its:param name="theName">theDefaultValue</its:param> > > It seems to be relatively simple to implement. See the attached files. > > Cheers, > -ys > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 05:04:37 UTC