w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from January to March 2002 by author

Aleksey Sanin

• Re: The root CA for the XMLDSig Interop tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• broken URL in the (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more... (Wednesday, 20 March)
• XMLSec Library xmldsig interop report (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report (Saturday, 16 March)
• Inclusive and exclusive XML Canonicalization in libxml2 (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: questions about exc-c14n (Sunday, 3 March)
• questions about exc-c14n (Sunday, 3 March)

Apvrille, Axelle

• RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm (Wednesday, 16 January)

Ari Kermaier

• Re: XML Signature SDK Testing (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Beta exc-c14n report (Friday, 8 February)
• enveloping signature (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: How do I represent a Certificate Chain (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)

Bikash Paul

• Newbie Question???? (Friday, 22 February)

Bob Atkinson

• RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Tuesday, 12 March)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: XML Signature SDK Testing (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: Whitespace (Saturday, 12 January)

Brown, Sam

• RE: xmldsig-core and xml-exc-c14n published (Thursday, 14 February)

Carl Ellison

• Re: Attribute certificate (Saturday, 23 March)
• dsig signature algorithms (Sunday, 3 February)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more... (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more... (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Alternative XPath Filter (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Minor Typos in XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0, Revision 1.4 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Announcement: Apache XML Security v1.0.0 (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: enveloping signature (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: dsig signature algorithms (Sunday, 3 February)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Friday, 1 February)
• Test vectors for draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt (Wednesday, 30 January)
• How do I represent a Certificate Chain (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Whitespace (Saturday, 12 January)
• Re: Whitespace (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Re: ordering of multiple X509Certificates (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Newbie Question???? (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: other signature algorithm (Friday, 22 February)
• Revised Additional URIs Internet-Drafts (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: DOM WG last call comments on Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo (Monday, 7 January)

Dournaee, Blake

• String Serial Number Representation (Tuesday, 5 February)

dwight funk

• RE: XML Signature SDK Testing (Friday, 1 March)
• XML Signature SDK Testing (Friday, 1 March)

Ed Simon

• Re: Whitespace (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: xml:space (Friday, 11 January)

edsimon@xmlsec.com

• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)

Eric Miller

• Re: RDF C14N Comments (Monday, 4 March)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Saturday, 2 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: RDF C14N Max or Min (Monday, 4 March)

Gregor Karlinger

• RE: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Error in XML-Signature interop report page (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Update interop report on XML-Signature Core Syntax and Processing (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Interoperability Report on Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Attribute certificate (Monday, 25 March)
• RE: Test Vectors for DName encoding (Thursday, 21 March)
• Test Vectors for DName encoding (Thursday, 21 March)
• XMLDSIG erratum (Sunday, 17 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 15 March)
• RE: String Serial Number Representation (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: X509SubjectName and binary values (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Sunday, 20 January)
• RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm (Wednesday, 16 January)
• ECDSA as signature algorithm (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: space (Monday, 14 January)

Harada

• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Are there DName encoding samples? (Tuesday, 5 March)

Herry

• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: X509SubjectName and binary values (Wednesday, 23 January)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-03.txt (Monday, 21 January)

Janet Daly

• Call for Testimonials, XML Signature (Thursday, 31 January)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RDF C14N Max or Min (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF C14N XML Literal Equality (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF C14N InclusiveNamespaces (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: RDF C14N Comments (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF C14N Comments (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF XML Canonicalization Intro (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF & XML Literals: Intro (Monday, 4 March)
• RDF & enveloping of XML structures (Monday, 4 March)

Joe Kesselman

• RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)

Joel Hockey

• ordering of multiple X509Certificates (Friday, 8 March)

John Boyer

• RE: Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Thursday, 21 March)
• Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 15 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: XPath errors in specifications (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 31 January)
• Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21 (Thursday, 10 January)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Friday, 29 March)
• Fwd: Announcement: DOM Level 3 XPath in Last Call (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Interoperability Report on Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Update interop report on XML-Signature Core Syntax and Processing (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Error in XML-Signature interop report page (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: Test Vectors for DName encoding (Thursday, 21 March)
• Fwd: New Erratum E04 (Was: NFC) (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: New XPath Filter Transform (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Minor Typos in XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0, Revision 1.4 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: XMLDSIG erratum (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Infomosaic SecureXML Interoperability test results (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Thursday, 14 March)
• Esoteric C14N and Security Cautions (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Inclusive and exclusive XML Canonicalization in libxml2 (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: questions about exc-c14n (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: XML Signature SDK Testing (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Please Update Interop Matrix for GapXse (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Friday, 15 February)
• xmldsig-core and xml-exc-c14n published (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: String Serial Number Representation (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Beta exc-c14n report (Friday, 8 February)
• Final Tweaks to Exclusive XML Canonicalization CR (Friday, 8 February)
• New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 7 February)
• Beta exc-c14n report (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Some exc-c14n tests (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Friday, 1 February)
• Some exc-c14n tests (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Normative vs. non-normative references (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: X509SubjectName and binary values (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Wednesday, 23 January)
• History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Requesting advance of xml-exc to Candidate REC (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: ECDSA as signature algorithm (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Whitespace (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: minor post-last call exclusive c14n comment (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21) (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: XML Protocol comments on Exclusive Canonicalization (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21 (Thursday, 10 January)
• PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21 (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Whitespace (Tuesday, 8 January)

Kabuy

• Please Update Interop Matrix for GapXse (Friday, 22 February)

Karl Scheibelhofer

• RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Monday, 28 January)

Manoj K. Srivastava

• Infomosaic SecureXML Interoperability test results (Saturday, 16 March)

Martin Duerst

• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Sunday, 17 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Encryption and Unicode (was: Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107) (Thursday, 10 January)

Mauro Arcolini

• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Thursday, 7 February)

merlin

• for my ref (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: The root CA for the XMLDSig Interop tests (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more... (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more... (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: XMLDSIG erratum (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Enveloped Signature Transform (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Some exc-c14n tests (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Test vectors for draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21) (Monday, 14 January)
• minor post-last call exclusive c14n comment (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: xml:space (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21) (Friday, 11 January)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Normative vs. non-normative references (Thursday, 24 January)
• Normative vs. non-normative references (Thursday, 24 January)

Pavel Zavora

• Enveloped Signature Transform (Friday, 1 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: DOM WG last call comments on Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Thursday, 17 January)
• DOM WG last call comments on Exclusive XML Canonicalization (Friday, 4 January)

Raghavan N. Srinivas

• Re: WWW2002 CFP (Monday, 4 February)

RFC Editor

• RFC 3275 on XML-Signature Syntax and Processing (Thursday, 14 March)

Rich Salz

• Re: Whitespace (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Whitespace (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Whitespace (Tuesday, 8 January)

Serge Dussault

• Attribute certificate (Friday, 22 March)

Shingo Kinoshita

• other signature algorithm (Tuesday, 19 February)

Simon Blake-Wilson

• RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm (Thursday, 17 January)

Steve Mathews

• Re: Normative vs. non-normative references (Saturday, 26 January)

Steve Wang

• Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1) (Tuesday, 5 March)

TAMURA Kent

• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report (Friday, 15 March)
• Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: XPath errors in specifications (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: New XPath Filter Transform (Thursday, 7 March)
• XPath errors in specifications (Thursday, 7 March)

The IESG

• Protocol Action: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Draft Standard (Tuesday, 5 February)

TheCroll

• A typo (Saturday, 16 February)

Thomas Maslen

• Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21 (Wednesday, 9 January)

Tom Gindin

• Re: Attribute certificate (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: Test Vectors for DName encoding (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: ordering of multiple X509Certificates (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Are there DName encoding samples? (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Encryption code-set issues (Was Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107) (Wednesday, 9 January)

Xavier Orri

• Xml- Spki Certification (Sunday, 13 January)

zusatzeinkommen@usa.net

• Mega Zusatzverdienst mit wenig Aufwand (Tuesday, 19 February)

Last message date: Friday, 29 March 2002 17:02:20 UTC