--On Freitag, 11. Januar 2002 17:30 -0800 Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com> wrote: > 3) If we were going to put the attribute anywhere, then I believe > Joseph's comment is correct that it would be more appropriate for the > attribute to go on ext:Foo. (Notice that since dsig:Object does not > itself have any significant semantic beyond a mere container, it is the > case that in fact doing it this way (on ext:foo) is fully equivalently > expressive.) I agree with Brian about that this is a good solution if the schema is _not_ tweaked. I am no schema crack, but if the dsig schema cannot be overwritten in a way that an application re-defined a ds:Object to contain only Elements (so that xml:space would be important for direct ds:Object/text() children, then the application developer can put the xml:space='preserve' into every element child of the ds:Object: <ds:Object> <custom:Elem1 xml:space="preserve"> ... </custom:Elem1> <custom:Elem2 xml:space="preserve"> ... </custom:Elem2> </ds:Object>Received on Saturday, 12 January 2002 06:54:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT