W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Whitespace

From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 21:45:08 +0100
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>, reagle@w3.org
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-id: <1468194338.1010785508@[]>

--On Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 21:26 -0500 Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com> 

> I agree, allowing both xml:lang and xml:space is better.

I agree that the schema should be extended to allow somthing like this:

<ds:Object xml:space="preserve"> <a> 
<dontEvenThinkToIndentThatYouBadProcessor />
   <dontTouchMySurroundingSpaces />


Yes, that should (or even must?) be allowed. People should be able to 
protect their ds:Signatures agains wild'n'mad processors who want to 
beautify/indent every XML 'document' they process.

I don't think that this has (negative) security implications, it'll even 
give Signatures to chance to be more stable - especially when you from SOAP 
folks and pipes of SOAP processors doing wild things with the msgs.

Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 15:44:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:37 UTC