> I read the context part, and I think it is correct; I just misunderstood > the application of the resulting subtrees. I think that include should > be specified as set intersection, as exclude is set subtraction. Set > replacement would, I think, be non-intuitive and, in my opinion, bad. > We can get set replacement behaviour using set intersection and an input > nodeset from URI #xpointer(/). I agree with Merlin. intersection and subtraction seems better. -- TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBMReceived on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 21:06:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT