W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: New XPath Filter Transform

From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:05:10 +0900
Message-Id: <200203130205.LAA29602@ns.trl.ibm.com>
To: JBoyer@pureedge.com, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

> I read the context part, and I think it is correct; I just misunderstood
> the application of the resulting subtrees. I think that include should
> be specified as set intersection, as exclude is set subtraction. Set
> replacement would, I think, be non-intuitive and, in my opinion, bad.
> We can get set replacement behaviour using set intersection and an input
> nodeset from URI #xpointer(/).

I agree with Merlin.  intersection and subtraction seems better.

TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 21:06:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:37 UTC