- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:30:17 -0500
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
On Friday 11 January 2002 17:23, merlin wrote: > I objected (and still object) to the algorithm specifying an encoding for > the namespaces parameter when logically it is just a set. I would rather > the encoding be placed down in section 4 (editor's draft) where the > algorithm URI and encoding when used with XLDSIG is described. Done. I believe I now understand your objection. There's no need to specify how your implementation passes this structure around within itself; what is important is that the syntax be specified which is now done in sectino 4 "new revision: 1.31". > As for what encoding to use, I would advocate the encoding that XSLT > already uses, which is whitespace separated namespace prefixes with > #default to indicate the default namespace. This is done too. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 17:30:25 UTC