W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: New XPath Filter Transform

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:59:12 -0500
Message-Id: <200203072159.QAA04842@tux.w3.org>
To: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Cc: jboyer@pureedge.com
I'll defer your question to John but apoligize that I didn't publish the 
editorially tweaked version (with some renaming, schema, and namespace). 
The latest version is at:

On Thursday 07 March 2002 00:29, TAMURA Kent wrote:
> In message "New XPath Filter Transform"
>     on 02/02/07, Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> writes:
> > Thoughts? (On these syntax issues, or implementation performance)
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-transform-xpath.html
> Does this transform ignore the input nodeset except the root
> node?  Does a resultant nodeset contain a node which is not
> contained in the input nodeset but it is selected by
> SignatureFilter XPath expression?


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 16:59:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:37 UTC