W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: other signature algorithm

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:25:48 -0500
Message-Id: <200202220325.WAA0000012566@torque.pothole.com>
To: Shingo Kinoshita <kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp>
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi,

Yes, you can submit a separate individual draft and progress it to an
Informational RFC. Or, it might be possible to include it in a future
version of the additional URIs draft:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt

Thanks,
Donald

From:  Shingo Kinoshita <kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp>
To:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-Id:  <20020219202824M.kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp>
Date:  Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:28:24 +0900

>Dear XML Signature working group,
>
>There are only two digital signature algorithm defined in
>"XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"(W3C Recommendation 12 February
>2002).
>How can we propose other digital signature algorithm as a
>"Recommended method"? Should we submit a draft to IETF xmldsig wg at
>first?
>
>Regards,
>
>-
>Shingo KINOSHITA, NTT Labs. 
>Email kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 22:29:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT