Hi, Yes, you can submit a separate individual draft and progress it to an Informational RFC. Or, it might be possible to include it in a future version of the additional URIs draft: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt Thanks, Donald From: Shingo Kinoshita <kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp> To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Message-Id: <20020219202824M.kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:28:24 +0900 >Dear XML Signature working group, > >There are only two digital signature algorithm defined in >"XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"(W3C Recommendation 12 February >2002). >How can we propose other digital signature algorithm as a >"Recommended method"? Should we submit a draft to IETF xmldsig wg at >first? > >Regards, > >- >Shingo KINOSHITA, NTT Labs. >Email kinosita@isl.ntt.co.jp > > > > > > > >Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 22:29:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT