> 1. In your email: should we emit a namespace for prefixes found in an > attribute value (or even element content?!). My take on that was that the rational intent of exclusive C14N was not to emit such a namespace. One reason is simply the difficulty of computing such a fact. If I had used an XSLT example with attribute values being XPath expressions then precisely which namespaces are being used there is non-trivial to tell. I suspect if one wanted to supported XSLT in the full, (including element content) then the question of which namespace prefixes were being (invisibly) used may even be Turing complete! I found the choices made in the two specs on this issue quite understandable. JeremyReceived on Monday, 4 March 2002 10:42:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT