W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Whitespace

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:36:47 -0500
Message-Id: <200201152136.QAA15766@tux.w3.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

As I'm sure you noted there was a lack of consensus on the list regarding 
this proposed change. I've noted the issue as closed in [1] unless you wish 
to have it flagged for consideration as cause for not going to REC and 
recycling the spec to a lower level or some other horrid evil thing <grin/>.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/20000228-last-call-issues.html#ProposedREC

On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:04, Rich Salz wrote:
> I believe that the SignatureProperty and Object element definitions
> should be modified to allow the xml:space attribute.  I'm proposing
> those two, because I believe those are the most likely elements within
> ds:Signature that will be covered by a signature.


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 16:36:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:37 UTC