public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from June 2007 by author

Alessandro Vernet

• Re: Recursion (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: On parameters (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: On parameters (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Pipeline Parameters by Default (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Tricky samples of position() (Thursday, 7 June)

Alex Milowski

• authentication on http-requests (Wednesday, 27 June)
• http-request as a filter (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere? (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Pipeline Parameters by Default (Thursday, 7 June)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007 (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007 (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Friday, 22 June)
• Default bindings on p:output incoherent??? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere? (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: On parameters (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: On parameters (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Two renames (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Two renames (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Pipeline Parameters by Default (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus on these three proposals? (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Proposal for p:split-sequence (Thursday, 7 June)
• Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit) (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Composability (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Composability (Thursday, 7 June)
• The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: position vs index (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Composability (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Low hanging fruit? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Another ('nother) parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Replace p:episode with p:system-property (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: position vs index (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Option syntax (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: High priority items for Thursday (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: For-each (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: can we have last() having a consistent value ? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Allow unknown steps? (Wednesday, 6 June)

Innovimax SARL

• Re: General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that) (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: p:wrap-sequence (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007 (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent??? (Saturday, 23 June)
• General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that) (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Consensus? (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: p:equal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: Two renames (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Two renames (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Pipeline Parameters by Default (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit) (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Tricky samples of position() (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: select in for-each and iteration-source (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: @select on p:for-each redundant? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• For-each (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: !result in components (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Option syntax (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Friday, 1 June)

Jeni Tennison

• Recursion (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: defaulting (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: defaulting (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Two renames (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Two renames (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Two renames (Monday, 11 June)
• Base URI processing (Monday, 11 June)
• Two renames (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Composability (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Proposal for p:split-sequence (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Composability (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: @select on p:for-each redundant? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Allow @namespace on p:pipeline (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 1 June)

Norman Walsh

• XProc Minutes 28 June 2007 (Thursday, 28 June)
• XProc Agenda 28 June 2007 (Tuesday, 26 June)
• p:map (Tuesday, 26 June)
• p:map (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Recursion (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Recursion (Monday, 25 June)
• Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007 (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent??? (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that) (Monday, 25 June)
• p:wrap-sequence (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: defaulting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Sunday, 24 June)
• XProc Minutes 21 June 2007 (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Default bindings on p:output incoherent??? (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: New draft...sortof (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere? (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere? (Thursday, 21 June)
• XProc Agenda 21 June 2007 (Wednesday, 20 June)
• New draft...sortof (Wednesday, 20 June)
• p:input vs. p:parameter-input (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Some edge cases with respect to parameters (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Allow ignored namespaces everywhere? (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Consensus? (Wednesday, 20 June)
• p:equal (Wednesday, 20 June)
• XProc Minutes 14 June 2007 (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: On parameters (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: On parameters (Wednesday, 13 June)
• XProc Agenda 14 June 2007 (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Two renames (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: On parameters (Tuesday, 12 June)
• On parameters (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Two renames (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Two renames (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Two renames (Monday, 11 June)
• New draft, 8 June 2007 (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Composability (Friday, 8 June)
• We need a versioning story (Thursday, 7 June)
• Cardinality of inputs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (Thursday, 7 June)
• XProc Minutes 7 June 2007 (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• Do we have consensus on these three proposals? (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Tricky samples of position() (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: select in for-each and iteration-source (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Composability (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: select in for-each and iteration-source (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: select in for-each and iteration-source (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Revised parameters proposal (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Composability (Wednesday, 6 June)
• @select on p:for-each redundant? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• XProc Agenda 7 June 2007 (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: position vs index (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Low hanging fruit? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Context for p:option (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: can we have last() having a consistent value ? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Cardinality of inputs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: !result in components (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: For-each (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Allow @namespace on p:pipeline (Monday, 4 June)
• High priority items for Thursday (Monday, 4 June)
• Updated editor's draft (Monday, 4 June)
• Wiki page for proposal tracking (Saturday, 2 June)
• Cardinality of inputs (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Friday, 1 June)
• Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes (Friday, 1 June)

Richard Tobin

• Re: defaulting (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: defaulting (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: defaulting (Friday, 22 June)
• defaulting (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)
• position() after match in component (Thursday, 7 June)

Rui Lopes

• Re: New draft...sortof (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: XProc Agenda 21 June 2007 (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: XProc Agenda 7 June 2007 (Wednesday, 6 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 June 2007 18:16:42 UTC