W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Revised parameters proposal

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:44:08 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0706061544k242e01f5x8af24f2741674a2e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 6/6/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>
> I think we're getting there. A few more comments from me.
>
> Norman Walsh wrote:
> > This proposal is my proposal from a few days ago adjusted to address
> > the comments made by Alex, Henry, and Jeni.
> >
> > 1. No more automatic inheritance. Consequently, remove parameters
> >    from compound steps.
>  >
> > 2. Add a grouping mechanism, a la XSLT attribute sets:
> >
> >    <p:parameter-set
> >      name = NCName>
> >     (p:inline|p:pipe|p:document|p:parameter*)
> >    </p:parameter-set>
> >
> >    For V1, I propose that p:parameter-set be allowed only as a child
> >    of p:pipeline.
>
> Is it allowed between steps or only before the subpipeline? I think the
> latter will be hard to use, so I hope it's the former.
>

I propose

For V1, I propose that p:parameter-set be allowed only as a child
of p:pipeline AND p:group.

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 22:44:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT