W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Low hanging fruit?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:10:47 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b7iqhe114.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> In atomic steps, I can just leave out the p:input element, but for
> compound steps I can't, so it would be inconvenient if
>
>   <p:input port="source"/>
>
> wasn't a request for the default binding.

Hunh?  Can't leave out _what_ p:input element?
E.g. p:iteration-source?  But it's optional, and defaults in the
obvious way . . .

I guess I agree with the proposal anyway. . .

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGZqRHkjnJixAXWBoRAlqZAJ943O68sdLjeO55SpaFt+Q6Ak7XIQCggmD5
e6/wzNqn3Rv1yGZHM4ZP5/w=
=NHto
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 12:10:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:52 GMT