W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit)

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:40:46 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0706080040h6175fb00yaa255d27f4c64285@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

>   What's going on is, just like components
>   which accept sequences, the p:input is seeing each document in turn,
>   and could count them. . .

I think that's the clarification we are turning around (which explain
my confusion with p:count if we have last())

I think it's worth going that way

Mohamed


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 07:40:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT