W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Two renames

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:30:41 +0100
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bk5u8xku6.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeni Tennison writes:

> What about p:resource?

I could certainly live with this, but your argument makes me wonder why
we ended up with 'source' on p:pipe. . .wouldn't
  <p:pipe step="..." port="..."/>
make more sense the way things have ended up?

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFGb7lBkjnJixAXWBoRAuadAJ9dYjhRrsYdzr9tDkuE36wZMjdJbgCY4HY5
QsQmv7ZF+gmW5zJFlLgcUg==
=sYIl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 09:30:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT