W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: For-each

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:07:32 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b6461flaz.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> | Since we mandate a perticular order for p:viewport, I propose to do
> | the same for the other component
> Well. Ok. We used to have an order for all of them, then we were
> persuaded to allow the elements in any order, but I forgot to change
> viewport. When I proposed to allow viewport elements to appear in any
> order, I got pushback.
> I don't care what we do wrt to ordered or unordered children, but I
> think we should do it for *all* the steps uniformly.

Agreed.  I retain an atavistic preference for fixed orders, but I
believe I'm in the minority, and can live with the alternative.

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 10:07:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:43 UTC