W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:27:29 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87k5txr1i6.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| / ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| | Alex Milowski writes:
| |
| |> On 6/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
| |
| |>> Now that we have a p:doc(umentation) element, does it still make sense
| |>> to have support for ignoring namespaces at every level?
| |
| |> I be happy with only allowing it on the document element or some
| |> "top-level".
| |
| | +1 -- let's constrain this to the places where it is actually likely
| | to be useful.
|
| Ok, I suggest that we allow the ignored-namespaces attribute (which
| can lose the 'p:' namespace now) only on p:pipeline in V1 and that

                              and p:pipeline-library ^

| elements in those namespaces are only ignored if they are direct
| children of the p:pipeline element.
                            ^ or p:pipeline-library
|
| The content of p:inline will continue to be "quoted" and the content
| of p:doc(umentation) will be ignored irrespective of the namespaces
| used.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 11:27:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT