W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: p:equal

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:56:00 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0706201156m5ec92189w948b62062f1021b0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Norm,

On 6/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> I recall discussing p:equal last week, but it doesn't seem to have been
> recorded in the minutes. Am I imagining it?

Nop, or we smoke the same thing, brother !

>
> FWIW, I believe we agreed to add p:equal with the semantics of
> fn:deep-equal.

Since the deep-equal definition is a bit more complex than needed, it
may be a cut and paste of *only* what we need would be good

>
> I think someone had a clever suggestion for the names of the two input
> documents, but for the life of me, I can't recall what it was.

Was it

<p:input port="source">
<p:input port="compare-to">

?
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
> http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 18:56:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT