W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Low hanging fruit?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:38:51 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <871wgpgq38.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
|
|> In atomic steps, I can just leave out the p:input element, but for
|> compound steps I can't, so it would be inconvenient if
|>
|>   <p:input port="source"/>
|>
|> wasn't a request for the default binding.
|
| Hunh?  Can't leave out _what_ p:input element?
| E.g. p:iteration-source?  But it's optional, and defaults in the
| obvious way . . .
|
| I guess I agree with the proposal anyway. . .

Uhm, yeah. Nevermind what I said, but I'm glad you agree anyway :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Resist the urge to hurry; it will only
http://nwalsh.com/            | slow you down--Bruce Eckel

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 13:38:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:52 GMT