Re: Two renames

/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
|
|> Yes, p:doc is a bad name. We came to that rather suddenly as I recall
|> and never revisited it. I'd be happy with p:documentation and I could
|> live with p:description, I think.
|
| I like p:documentation

I think that's two nods in favor of p:documentation and one for
p:description. Anyone else want to weigh in?

|> I like p:document but if that's too similar to p:doc(umentation), then
|> I guess I could live with p:uri.
|
| How about p:source -- I think 
|
|  <p:source href="....."/>
|
| will sit well alongside p:inline, p:pipe and p:empty.

I like p:source better than some of the other possibilities. Jeni,
how does that sound to you?


                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Ambition, n. An overmastering desire to
http://nwalsh.com/            | be vilified by enemies while living and
                              | ridiculed by friends when
                              | dead.--Ambrose Bierce