W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Do we have consensus on these three proposals?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:58:43 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87fy53hnn0.fsf@nwalsh.com>
I believe that the following proposals have been discussed on the list
and generally agreed to. If no one objects, I will incorporate them
into the next draft.

1. A select expression on p:input and friends which does not result
   in a (possibly empty) node set is a dynamic error.

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Jun/0000.html

2. Allow pipelines to contain calls to unknown/unimplemented steps.
   Make it a dynamic error to attempt to call one of them. Add a
   p:step-available(stepType) function to test the availability
   of a particular type of step.

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007May/0430.html

3. Allow @type on p:pipeline

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Jun/0013.html

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If a little knowledge is dangerous,
http://nwalsh.com/            | where is the man who has so much as to
                              | be out of danger?--Thomas. H. Huxley

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 13:58:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:53 GMT