public-rif-wg@w3.org from April 2008 by subject

4TH REASONING WEB SUMMER SCHOOL (RW 2008): Call for participation (online applications open now!)

[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 15

[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 21

[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 29

[Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 8 (revised)

[Admin] draft Minutes from April 22, 2008 telecon

[Asmin] Agenda for RIF telecon April 8

[BLD] comments on BLD draft

[BLD] review of snapshot version http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080410/

[DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed

[FLD+BLD] Diagrams

[FLD] Comments on draft dated April 7

[Fwd: Re: Questions about BLD conditions and rule syntax and XML translation]

[ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete)

[ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (1/2: abstract and concrete) -- small metadata handle

[ISSUE-51] Formulae wrappers (2/2: required or optional)

[ISSUE-51] organising a RIF document VS attaching metadata to items?

[RIF] comments on BLD, April 10 version

[RIF] comments on FLD, April 10 version

[RIF] draft minutes for 29 April 2008 telecon

[rif] draft minutse from 2008-04-01 teleconf

ACTION-430, Move specialization sections to appendices

ACTION-440, Add some test cases to the WIKI page about test cases

AGENDA and BLD Snapshot

ATTENTION: Revisiting a resolution

BLD changes from Apr 7 to Apr 10

Corrected draft minutes of RIF telecon, April 8

CURIE proposal ...

CURIE proposal ... (was: Re: [DTB] ACTIONs 428 and 292 completed)

data type extenibility (ISSUE-34)

discussion of metadata proposals

document publication mechanics - for editors

draft minutes of RIF telecon, April 8

DTB intermediate commit - still working on it

DTB status (on today's agenda)

FLD Snapshow ready (was Re: AGENDA and BLD Snapshot)

Galway registration/regrets survey (RIF F2F10)

import qus <-- RE: imports + metadata

importing RDF and OWL

imports "entailment regimes"

imports + metadata

issue-49 (xml naming) and BLD

ISSUE-50: Metadata [BLD]

ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax

ISSUE-51: Another possible compromise for metadata syntax --> org vs metadata

ISSUE-51: MetaData Syntax and Rule Identification [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]

ISSUE-52 (Entailment Regimes): Specification of OWL & RDF entailment regimes [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]

ISSUE-53: Annotation Properties in OWL [CP] [OWL/RDF Compatibility]

ISSUE-54 (DL-Safeness): What level of safeness in BLD/OWL-Dl combinations is required. [OWL/RDF Compatibility]

ISSUE-55 (STRIPING): Should the XML syntax be fully striped [CP] [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]

ISSUE-56 (Shortcuts): Should the presentation syntax have a simplied form in addition to the verbose form [CP] [BLD]

ISSUE-57 (Syntax Extensibility): Should the BLD XML syntax have an extensibility mechanism [CP] [BLD]

ISSUE-58 (COMMENTS): Embedded Comments in BLD [BLD]

ISSUE-59 (SURVIVABILITY): Survivability of metadata and comments [BLD]

Last call issues

Metadata for all and PS for metadata (Was Re: where to hang the metadata?)

Minutes from April 15, 2008, telecon

modules in RIF

new snapshots

PRD thoughts <--: where to hang the metadata?

Publication plan- REVIEWERS NEEDED!

publications are done

quick comments on BLD intro

review of OWL+RDF

review of RIF-FLD, April 10

Review of RIF-FLD, version of April 14, 2008

RIF BLD update

RIF Publications -- snapshots & review deadline

Rulesets

semantics of local constants - followup

semantics of local constants [was: Re: imports + metadata]

the <meta> tag

THE FOURTH REASONING WEB SUMMER SCHOOL (RW 2008): Call for participation

The problem with nested rulesets (aka groups)

w3c publication requirements

where to hang the metadata?

where to hang the metadata? (compromise proposal)

xpath namespace (was Re: DTB status (on today's agenda))

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:43:27 UTC