W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: where to hang the metadata?

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:56:59 +0200
Message-ID: <481601DB.5040103@ilog.fr>
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, public-rif-wg@w3.org

Michael Kifer wrote:
>>Just thinking about what is a reasonable scope for this WG, and where to 
> Why are you talking with riddles? Are you proposing to junk FLD? 

Hey, wait! No, not for a second!

I was just wondering how far we should go to make FLD cover... Well, 
that is exactly the question: FLD could potentially cover many things, 
and I wondered where we should just stop worrying about dialects that 
some people may want to develop in the future and whether FLD would be 
appropriate for their purpose (including wrt naming such as 'rule' vs 
'group', 'item' or what else)...

More specifically: I wonder if we should not just stop right where we 
are, add a Rule construct, maybe even a Fact one, and leave FLD 1.0 be 
FLD 1.0 until we need a FLD 2.0 that corrects it and/or go further.

Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 16:57:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:50 UTC