W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: CURIE proposal ...

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:18:47 +0100
Message-ID: <480E01D7.7090407@deri.org>
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Michael Kifer wrote:
>> My point is that a halfway stop is no good. Either have a fully  
>> specced Presentation Syntax or use the XML directly.
> Yeah! Write semantics using XML and then come back.

obviously a no go...

> Or just look at XML versions of the examples vs. the resentation syntax
> examples and tell me which ones you understand. I believe that Axels
> comment that XML is as easy as the presentation syntax (in RIF) 

Actually, I was arguing the other way around, i.e. the the presentation 
syntax is getting almost as bad as the XML synax in some places which is 
why I argued for simplifications in first place. I am all for a 
(readable) presentation syntax ;-)


> was made
> when he was not fully awake or in the heat of an argument.
> 	--michael  

Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

rdfs:Resource owl:differentFrom xsd:anyURI .
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 15:19:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:50 UTC