W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: review of RIF-FLD, April 10

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:05:43 -0400
To: Igor Mozetic <igor.mozetic@ijs.si>
Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <22316.1208196343@cs.sunysb.edu>

Thank you Igor, I put your suggestions in. Regarding your comment below, it
will be moved to DTB in due time. I recall that we discussed at the F2F
whether to make all types explicit or not, but do not remember what was the

Also, at the f2f we discussed what "support" really means, but forgot the
decision.  I think we did not make any resolution on that. Jos? Chris?


> RIF supports the following symbol spaces...
> (I already mentioned this in my first review):
>     * xsd:string (http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string) 
>   and all the symbol spaces that correspond to the subtypes 
>   of xsd:string as specified in [XML-SCHEMA2].
>     * xsd:decimal (http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal) 
>   and all the symbol spaces that corresponds to the subtypes 
>   of xsd:decimal as specified in [XML-SCHEMA2]. 
> Do you mean that support for all the subtypes of xsd: string and
> xsd:decimal has to be provided by RIF compliant systems?
> Shouldn't we make them explicit, then?
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 18:06:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:50 UTC