W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:53:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4804C17B.3020804@ilog.fr>
To: "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Boley, Harold wrote:
>>- section 2.2: Equality, class membership, subclass and frame terms 
>>allow only simple, positional and named-argument terms where individuals 
>>are expected: shouldn't external terms be allowed as well?
> They are already listed here:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#Terms

No, I meant: in "# Equality terms. If t and s are simple, positional, or 
named-argument terms then t = s is an equality term.", shouldn't t and s 
be allowed to be external terms as well (same for #, ## and frame)?

Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2008 14:54:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:50 UTC