Re: [BLD] comments on BLD draft

Boley, Harold wrote:
> 
>>- section 2.2: Equality, class membership, subclass and frame terms 
>>allow only simple, positional and named-argument terms where individuals 
>>are expected: shouldn't external terms be allowed as well?
> 
> They are already listed here:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#Terms

No, I meant: in "# Equality terms. If t and s are simple, positional, or 
named-argument terms then t = s is an equality term.", shouldn't t and s 
be allowed to be external terms as well (same for #, ## and frame)?

Christian