public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2008 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

• UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: "Should" sanity check (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: "Should" sanity check (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports (Wednesday, 28 May)
• functional style syntax (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Issue-111 another angle and questions (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: issue-21 / importing multiple versions of the same ontology (Wednesday, 28 May)
• issue-21 / importing multiple versions of the same ontology (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Requirement for ontology header (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Requirement for ontology header (Wednesday, 28 May)
• reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 28 May)
• reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• rdf:list vocabulary (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Agenda for teleconference 2008-05-28 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: ACTION-150 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Action-131: Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Tuesday, 27 May)
• No UFDTF Meeting monday due to holidays in US and UK (Sunday, 25 May)
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: Easy Keys text (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: Easy Keys text (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Sunday, 18 May)
• UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST (Friday, 9 May)
• Fwd: Last call announcement: CURIEs (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• proposal to close issue-4 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)

Alan Wu

• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Thursday, 22 May)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: Easy Keys text (Friday, 23 May)
• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Table/spec accessibility (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Easy Keys text (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Table/spec accessibility (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Easy Keys text (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: test cases on wiki (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: test cases on wiki (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: RIF comments (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (Wednesday, 7 May)
• ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Understanding n-ary data predicates (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Understanding n-ary data predicates (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)

Boris Motik

• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: DL-Syntax document: editorial bug (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: "Should" sanity check (Thursday, 29 May)
• "Should" sanity check (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: Action-131: Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Tuesday, 27 May)
• RE: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (Saturday, 24 May)
• RE: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• I have just implemented the proposed resolution of the imports (related to ISSUE-21) (Thursday, 15 May)
• RE: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST (Saturday, 10 May)
• RE: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec (Tuesday, 6 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Sunday, 4 May)

Carsten Lutz

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)

Elisa F. Kendall

• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST (Monday, 12 May)

Evan Wallace

• [UFDTF] update of UFDTF wiki space and creation of Reqs doc work area (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Tuesday, 20 May)

gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr

• RE: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Wednesday, 21 May)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: test cases on wiki (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach (Monday, 19 May)

Ivan Herman

• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Minutes of yesterday's TC (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: syntax for "langed" literals (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Friday, 2 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)

Jeff Z. Pan

• Re: Minutes 21/05/2008 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Minutes 21/05/2008 (Tuesday, 27 May)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: rif-rdf-owl: OWL WG review (Thursday, 29 May)
• bye for now (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? (Tuesday, 27 May)
• I18N issues an OWL2 (Wednesday, 21 May)
• GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Friday, 16 May)
• ACTION-146: HP and n-ary datatypes (Thursday, 15 May)
• rif-rdf-owl: OWL WG review (Thursday, 15 May)
• Re: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: RIF comments (Tuesday, 13 May)
• RIF comments (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange (Monday, 12 May)
• OWL/XML and GRDDL (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: review of RIF-RDF-OWL (expert level) (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: review of RIF-RDF-OWL (Tuesday, 6 May)
• review of RIF-RDF-OWL (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Full] another minor bug in OWL1 Full (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Tuesday, 6 May)

Jos de Bruijn

• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Friday, 23 May)

Michael Schneider

• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Thursday, 29 May)
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 29 May)
• DL-Syntax document: editorial bug (Thursday, 29 May)
• Question about problems with top/bottom property (Thursday, 29 May)
• RDF Reification for annotations and negative property assertions (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? (Saturday, 24 May)
• RE: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [ACTION-147] Delay in review of RDF mapping document (Tuesday, 20 May)
• RE: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach (Tuesday, 20 May)
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Thursday, 8 May)
• RE: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Thursday, 8 May)
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Thursday, 8 May)
• Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Wednesday, 7 May)
• RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (Wednesday, 7 May)
• RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 (Wednesday, 7 May)
• RE: Understanding n-ary data predicates (Wednesday, 7 May)
• RE: Minor bug in http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/rdfs.html#5.2 (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Understanding n-ary data predicates (Tuesday, 6 May)
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Tuesday, 6 May)
• RE: proposal to close issue-4 (Tuesday, 6 May)

Michael Smith

• DL-Lite Profile - new tracking implementation (Wednesday, 7 May)
• IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible (Wednesday, 7 May)

OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-129 (rdf:list vocabulary): Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary available for use in modeling in OWL 2 (Friday, 30 May)
• ISSUE-128 (MAY/SHOULD/MUST): Normative documents should pass a MAY/SHOULD/MUST sanity check (Wednesday, 28 May)
• ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (Saturday, 24 May)
• ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited (Wednesday, 21 May)
• ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Sunday, 18 May)
• ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain (Sunday, 4 May)
• ISSUE-123 (QCR in OWL-R-Full): Should we add QCR-s into the rule set of OWL-R-Full (Saturday, 3 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: reification/annotations (Wednesday, 28 May)
• ACTION-150 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Minutes 21/05/2008 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: RIF comments (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: Wiki gone haywire? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: proposal to close issue-4 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• syntax for "langed" literals (Tuesday, 6 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Friday, 2 May)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Question about the topProperty (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property (Friday, 30 May)
• Re: "Should" sanity check (Thursday, 29 May)
• Re: Requirement for ontology header (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Requirement for ontology header (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] (Saturday, 24 May)
• Re: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Monday, 19 May)
• Re: [p4-feedback] [Pellet-users] Protege4 & Pellet compatibility (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) (Friday, 9 May)
• Minutes of yesterday's TC (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: Wiki gone haywire? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Wiki gone haywire? (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Thursday, 1 May)

Sandro Hawke

• regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Table/spec accessibility (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 (Wednesday, 21 May)
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Friday, 16 May)
• rif:text / owl:internationalizedString (Friday, 16 May)
• Re: why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) (Friday, 9 May)
• why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) (Thursday, 8 May)
• test cases on wiki (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: syntax for "langed" literals (Tuesday, 6 May)

Uli Sattler

• CfP OWLED 2008 (Tuesday, 20 May)
• Re: why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) (Friday, 9 May)
• Grddl et al (Thursday, 8 May)

Last message date: Friday, 30 May 2008 19:49:58 UTC