W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2008

RE: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]

From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 08:40:30 +0100
To: "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c8bd71$7142b390$0200a8c0@wolf>

Well, I believe we should first decide whether we want n-ary datatypes in the language. If we decide we don't want them, I'll remove
any mention to them; if we decide to include n-ary datatypes, I shall complete the document.

The scenario where I am first going to remove all references to n-ary datatypes just to add them back two weeks later I find highly
undesirable, and I hope you sympathize.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working
> Group Issue Tracker
> Sent: 24 May 2008 01:55
> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL
> 2 [editorial]
> 
> 
> 
> ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2
> [editorial]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
> 
> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
> On product:
> 
> At least the syntax, rdf mapping, and semantics documents contain portions that refer to nary
> datatypes. As we have not yet decided to include nary datatypes in OWL 2, these should be removed.
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 24 May 2008 07:42:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 24 May 2008 07:42:06 GMT