- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:09:27 -0400
- To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'Evan Wallace'" <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>, "'Michael Schneider'" <schneid@fzi.de>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On May 21, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Boris Motik wrote: > I really do not expect people to use complemented data ranges > directly. Over and over, in many different technical situations over the years, such predictions have been shown to be wrong, and therefore I don't think this reasoning should be used in considering resolving this issue. Last such in the OWL space: No one will want to make large sets of classes disjoint. If the feature is there, it will be used. If the common situation is that it will be error prone, then I think it's worth considering either a) figuring out how to find a way to not expose it or b) provide and document a mechanism for avoiding those errors. -Alan
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 13:10:10 UTC