Re: review of RIF-RDF-OWL

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 18:38:39 +0100
• To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4820979F.3060509@hpl.hp.com>

discussion of comment points




Only two points to consider,
A) what do we want them to say about OWL2 see comment 17 at the very end 
of the message.

B) do we want to make a fuss about ^^rif:iri and "text@lang"^^rif:text
These are poorly "datatypes" (the defn seems to be at
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB
) that replace the more familiar (at least to us) conventions of
<http://uri> and "text"@lang

If we do, I suspect the WG would want to tone down some of my 
exasperation - most of the other comments are on this topic.

Jeremy

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 17:39:24 UTC