Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > >>> OWL DLP (for description logic programs) > > What would the corresponding name for OWL-R Full be? OWL FLP (OWL Flop? > hmmm, perhaps not so good ;)) :-) I somehow look at OWL DLP as a 'generic' name, just like OWL itself. We may have then a DL and Full variant, so to say, again just like for OWL we have OWL DL and OWL Full. However... OWL DLP DL sounds a bit silly, doesn't it:-(. Sigh... If we break the rules of Markus (which I actually liked, though), ie, to use the same number of characters, than we could have OWL LP and OWL DLP for the Full/DL version. I. > > -Rinke > >> Actually, these are not bad at all... >> >> Can someone solve a mystery for me? Where does the 'EL++' terminology >> come from? I can relate, technically, both to RDL and DLP, but not to >> that EDL because of that (I am not knowledgable of Description Logic...) >> >> Ivan >> >> >> -- >> >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 08:07:59 UTC