W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > May 2008

reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 23:32:18 -0400
Message-Id: <46C0B7D4-7385-492F-9105-04991295D924@gmail.com>
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

In http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/mapping.html, it says:

For the purposes of determining whether an RDF graph is an OWL DL  
ontology in RDF graph form, cardinality restrictions are explicitly  
allowed to use constructions like "1"^^xsd:integer so long as the  
data value so encoded is a non-negative integer.

Therefore, for backwards compatibility, should the reverse mapping  
explicitly have a mapping for the (non qualified) cardinality cases  
where it currently only says xsd:nonNegativeInteger?

Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 03:33:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC