RE: reification/annotations

No, we have not yet made this decision.

Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 May 2008 04:19
> To: Boris Motik; OWL Working Group WG
> Subject: reification/annotations
> 
> In the RDF mapping document, we have:
> 
> > Consider the following subclass axiom:
> >
> > SubClassOf( Comment( "Children are people." ) a:Child a:Person )
> >
> > Without the annotation, the axiom would be translated into the
> > following triple:
> >
> > a:Child rdfs:subClassOf a:Person
> >
> > Thus, the annotated axiom is transformed into the following triples:
> >
> > _:x rdf:type owl:Axiom
> > _:x rdf:subject a:Child
> > _:x rdf:predicate rdfs:subClassOf
> > _:x rdf:object a:Person
> > _:x rdfs:comment "Children are people."
> >
> >
> 
> Had we not decided to include the triple being reified in the
> serialization when using reification? So would the serialization be:
> 
> a:Child rdfs:subClassOf a:Person
> _:x rdf:type owl:Axiom
> _:x rdf:subject a:Child
> _:x rdf:predicate rdfs:subClassOf
> _:x rdf:object a:Person
> _:x rdfs:comment "Children are people."
> ?
> 
> 
> 
> -Alan
> 
> 
> 
>