Re: reification/annotations

I'm recalling that we discussed it and thought we had resolved it but  
was not sure, hence the question. If someone can pull out the  
discussion where (if anywhere) we decided this one way or another,  
then that would be helpful. Otherwise we can discuss it tomorrow.

(Tracker: this is relevant to Issue-67 and Issue-81)

-Alan

On May 27, 2008, at 11:34 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>> Had we not decided to include the triple being reified in the
>> serialization when using reification?
>
> My recollection is that indeed we have not decided to include the  
> triple
> being reified in the serialization when using reification.  (Of  
> course,
> my recollection may be faulty, but then where is the discussion and
> resolution for the change?)