public-i18n-its@w3.org from July to September 2006 by author

Addison Phillips

• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 2881] Change abstract (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [Bug 2808] Existing locInfo-like markup cannot be mapped using the locInfoSelector method (Monday, 18 September)
• [Bug 2719] Namespace requirement and selector values (Monday, 18 September)
• [Bug 3516] Editorial comments on ITS from i18n core (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3515] xml:lang = language info, please (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3514] Attributes missing? (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3513] ITS markup must be integrated (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3512] Example 14 dir (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3511] Example 14 translate (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3510] Spell out the attributes (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3509] Too many places to look (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3508] Example 32 head (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3507] in the case of no selection (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3506] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3505] Use Japanese in Example 31 (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3504] Example 31 lacks rp (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3503] Refer to bidi article (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3502] Example 30 (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3501] Some Hebrew quotation (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3500] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3499] Is dir mandatory? (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3498] Repetition (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3493] Marks terms and meanings (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3491] Explanations for examples (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3490] Examples 22 and 23 (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3489] Mention translation tools (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3488] 6.3 ed 1 (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3487] Invert translate examples (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3482] Inheritance of translation information (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3481] Translatability (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3479] Example 33 (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3468] xml:lang missing (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3467] rubyText is an attribute (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3466] Existing ruby markup (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3465] Default is ltr (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3462] Pointing to terms (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3461] Role of termInfo (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3460] Loc Info or Loc Note (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3459] Use of elements (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3458] Default translate value (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3457] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3497] No implementation section (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3496] Standardised wording (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3494] termInfoRefPointer referant's data (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3492] Example 24 (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3492] Example 24 (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3409] Inconsistent use of single- and double-quotes (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3408] The attribute name "translate" may be confusing (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3361] No defined behavior if external rules can't be accessed (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3360] Following the inheritance of the rules can be difficult (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3331] Please use XHTML Modularization for defining ITS DTD and Schema (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3330] lro and rlo explanation (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3329] Reference to its:span (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3328] Order of precedence in selection (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor" (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3321] Relation of terminology data category to existing standards for terminology (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3320] Using IDs for nodes instead of / in addition to XPath (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3319] Namespace binding mechanism (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3317] Linking of versions of textual segments via "localization information" data category (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3297] Extensibility and its namespace (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3295] What kind of document (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3293] Conformance/Compliance (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3292] XHTML Module for XHTML 1.1 or XHTML 2.0 (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3291] Selector attribute and XSLT (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :) (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3126] Attaching information to the object associated to a selected node (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3296] General comment (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3294] Conformance section (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3068] Metadata for rules necessary (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3062] Need to write examples in the spec as valid XML (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3058] ITS inheritance mechanism versus other inheritance mechanisms (e.g. DITA): Need for clear distinction (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3057] Proposal for grouping rules (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3050] Linking mechanism (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3039] Proposal: check constraints in global rules (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3017] rename documentRules and documentRule (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3016] ITS schema structure redesign (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3010] RELAX NG schema should use common prefix for patterns (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3007] Terminology: "data category" (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3005] Relation of rules for translatable attributes versus non-translatable elements (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3004] Work on modularizations (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3000] Allowing extensibility in its:documentRules (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2969] Terminology (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2951] The Section "Basic concepts" needs to be reviewed (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2935] processing expectations for ruby / directionality (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2926] RELAX NG schemas can de ambiguous (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2924] Why a closed list of schema languages? (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2923] Possible conflicts between schemas and instances (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2922] The word "tag" is not appropriate (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2915] Clarify relationship between host vocabulary markup data cats and ITS data cats (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2890] Terminology: local versus global not used much in the draft (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2883] Reword reference to "Localization Properties" in "Out-of-scope" section (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2882] Reword "Motivation for ITS" (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2881] Change abstract (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract (Monday, 24 July)
• [Bug 2719] Namespace requirement and selector values (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2878] "Element within text" data category (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2877] Terminology data category (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2879] Ruby data category (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2876] Need to address versioning (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2761] "Products which ITS will encompass" (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2808] Existing locInfo-like markup cannot be mapped using the locInfoSelector method (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2621] On conformance levels: Have a simple conformance: in situ, with default selectors (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2620] Necessity of dislocated scope / selectors *and* insitu scope / selectors (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2619] Complexity of precedence rules for "scope" (or "selectors") (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2618] Proposal for a "translateAddinfo" attribute (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2558] entry point for schemas (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2557] namespace of attributes (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 2556] syntax errors in markup (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract (Friday, 21 July)
• [Bug 3516] Editorial comments on ITS from i18n core (Thursday, 20 July)
• [Bug 3515] xml:lang = language info, please (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3515] Attributes missing?xml:lang = language info, please (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3514] Attributes missing? (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3513] ITS markup must be integrated (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3512] Example 14 dir (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3511] Example 14 translate (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3510] Spell out the attributes (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3509] Too many places to look (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3508] Example 32 head (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3507] in the case of no selection (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3506] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3505] Use Japanese in Example 31 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3504] Example 31 lacks rp (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3503] Refer to bidi article (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3502] Example 30 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3501] Some Hebrew quotation (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3502] Example 30 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3500] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3499] Is dir mandatory? (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3498] Repetition (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3497] No implementation section (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3496] Standardised wording (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3495] Hard to know what this is about (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3494] termInfoRefPointer referant's data (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3493] Marks terms and meanings (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3492] Example 24 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3491] Explanations for examples (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3490] Examples 22 and 23 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3489] Mention translation tools (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3488] 6.3 ed 1 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3487] Invert translate examples (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [Bug 3482] Inheritance of translation information (Tuesday, 18 July)
• [Bug 3481] Translatability (Tuesday, 18 July)
• [Bug 3480] Use of xml:lang (Tuesday, 18 July)
• [Bug 3479] Example 33 (Tuesday, 18 July)
• [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3473] Language information data category overview (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3329] Reference to its:span (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3328] Order of precedence in selection (Monday, 17 July)
• [Bug 3465] Default is ltr (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3464] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3468] xml:lang missing (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3467] rubyText is an attribute (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3466] Existing ruby markup (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3463] termInfoRef should allow for id strings (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3462] Pointing to terms (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3461] Role of termInfo (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3460] Loc Info or Loc Note (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3459] Use of elements (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3458] Default translate value (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3457] RFC 3066bis (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3456] Attribute used for locInfo (Friday, 14 July)
• [Bug 3408] The attribute name "translate" may be confusing (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3409] Inconsistent use of single- and double-quotes (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3331] Please use XHTML Modularization for defining ITS DTD and Schema (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3297] Extensibility and its namespace (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3295] What kind of document (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3293] Conformance/Compliance (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3291] Selector attribute and XSLT (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3287] Clarity of language in the abstract (Thursday, 13 July)
• [Bug 3319] Namespace binding mechanism (Wednesday, 12 July)
• [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear (Sunday, 9 July)
• [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category (Saturday, 8 July)
• [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear (Saturday, 8 July)
• [Bug 3360] Following the inheritance of the rules can be difficult (Saturday, 8 July)
• [Bug 3361] No defined behavior if external rules can't be accessed (Saturday, 8 July)
• [Bug 3362] method for translatability of attributes not clear (Saturday, 8 July)
• [Bug 3318] Clarify "within text" data category (Saturday, 8 July)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Existing ruby markup (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Thursday, 28 September)
• Need to have language information data category as a feature at risk? (Thursday, 28 September)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-09-27 (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: AW: Features at risk (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: AW: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: AW: Features at risk (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Features at risk (Sunday, 24 September)
• On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Saturday, 23 September)
• Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Sunday, 24 September)
• On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Sunday, 24 September)
• Features at risk (Saturday, 23 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: Question about reference to OpenDocument (Wednesday, 20 September)
• On directionality and CSS (Monday, 18 September)
• [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"] (Monday, 18 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 13 September)
• issues list update (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory? (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: Changes (Sunday, 10 September)
• todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element (Friday, 8 September)
• Changes in the tagset draft (Friday, 8 September)
• Diffs (part 2) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Diffs for WD changes (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Term="yes|no" (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: Term="yes|no" (Thursday, 31 August)
• Issues update (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Inheritance for terms (Wednesday, 30 August)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-08-30 (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: Term="yes|no" (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Re: Term="yes|no" (Wednesday, 30 August)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-31 ssues list updated) (Tuesday, 1 August)
• IRI, Directionality and Ruby in ITS (Saturday, 29 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-28 (issues list updated) (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: ITS elements needing span or span-attributes (Friday, 28 July)
• Updated issues list (Friday, 28 July)
• Issue list update (Thursday, 27 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-26 (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :) (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [Fwd: [xml-dev] Localizable XML description of form] (Tuesday, 25 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-24 (Monday, 24 July)
• Proposal for xml:lang (Monday, 24 July)
• About ruby in ITS global usage (Monday, 24 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-21 (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: LC comments - current state (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: LC comments - current state (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: DITA Translation Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: 17 July 2006 (Friday, 21 July)
• LC comments - current state (Friday, 21 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-19 (Wednesday, 19 July)
• Re: Reply to last call comment on "Internationalization Tag Set" (Wednesday, 19 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-17 (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: Reply to last call comment on "Internationalization Tag Set" (Friday, 7 July)
• [I18N ITS] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-05 (Wednesday, 5 July)

Lieske, Christian

• RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Tuesday, 26 September)
• AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Monday, 25 September)
• Rückruf: Re: AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Monday, 25 September)
• AW: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Monday, 25 September)
• AW: Features at risk (Monday, 25 September)
• AW: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Monday, 25 September)
• AW: Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule> (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Prioritizing Editor's Changes (Friday, 11 August)
• http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3495 (action item from conf. call 09 August 2006) (Wednesday, 9 August)
• RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Tuesday, 25 July)
• RE: [Bug 3290] Introduction too "positive" and not enough informative :) (Tuesday, 25 July)

Martin Duerst

• Re: AW: Features at risk (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Term="yes|no" (Thursday, 31 August)
• RE: Term="yes|no" (Thursday, 31 August)
• Re: AW: Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule> (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Thursday, 6 July)

Najib Tounsi

• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Friday, 15 September)

nobody@w3.org

• [ESW Wiki] Update of "its0503ReqWhoShouldRead" by RichardIshida (Friday, 28 July)
• [ESW Wiki] Update of "its0503ReqWhoShouldRead" by RichardIshida (Friday, 28 July)

Richard Ishida

• RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Thursday, 28 September)
• RE: Issue 3466, including action items http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action02 and item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action11 (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: On issue 3640 and action item http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action12 (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Tuesday, 26 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Friday, 22 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS (Wednesday, 20 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Wednesday, 20 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: lang ref and rfc4646 (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference (Wednesday, 13 September)
• I18n Comments (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Monday, 24 July)
• RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Proposal to include reference to " Requirements for Localizable DTD Design" (Tuesday, 11 July)
• RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Thursday, 6 July)
• Changes to publications list (Monday, 3 July)
• Changes to publications list (Monday, 3 July)

Sebastian Rahtz

• Re: Features at risk (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: ITS version attribute (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: ITS Teleconf - Friday Sep-08-2006 15:00 UTC (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: Behavior for ITS elements in document instances (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Wednesday, 12 July)
• Re: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Wednesday, 12 July)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: Reply to last call comment on "Internationalization Tag Set" (Wednesday, 19 July)

Yves Savourel

• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please (Thursday, 21 September)
• RE: [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"] (Thursday, 21 September)
• RE: Question about reference to OpenDocument (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Proposal for Ruby (Wednesday, 20 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Question about reference to OpenDocument (Wednesday, 20 September)
• ITS Teleconf - Wednesday Sep-20-2006 14:00 UTC (Monday, 18 September)
• RE: On directionality and CSS (Monday, 18 September)
• RE: [Fwd: [Bug 3323] Version of XPath: Write "XPath 1.0 or its successor"] (Monday, 18 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Sunday, 17 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Friday, 15 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
• Global Rule for Ruby (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he' (Thursday, 14 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability (Wednesday, 13 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Xml:lang ref and rfc4646 (Tuesday, 12 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: todo: write mail about pointer attributes at the rubyRule element (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Missing document reference (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mary's editorial comments on ITS (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: issues list update (Monday, 11 September)
• RE: Changes in the tagset draft (Friday, 8 September)
• ITS Teleconf - Friday Sep-08-2006 15:00 UTC (Thursday, 7 September)
• Example changes (Wednesday, 6 September)
• RE: Term="yes|no" (Wednesday, 30 August)
• RE: Term="yes|no" (Wednesday, 30 August)
• Term="yes|no" (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule> (Tuesday, 22 August)
• Missing term="yes|no" attribute for <termRule> (Monday, 21 August)
• RE: [Bug 3479] Example 33 (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Best Practices WD updated (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Teleconference Minutes 2006-08-09 (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Best Practices update (Thursday, 3 August)
• locNote on locNote (elated to issue #3459) (Monday, 31 July)
• Issue 3513: "ITS markup must be integrated" (Monday, 31 July)
• [public-i18n-its] <none> (Thursday, 27 July)
• Issues Report (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Wednesday, 26 July)
• RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Examples and descriptions (Monday, 24 July)
• Exploring the change from Ref to Uri (Monday, 24 July)
• RE: Proposal for xml:lang (Monday, 24 July)
• ITS elements needing span or span-attributes (Monday, 24 July)
• Example 25 (Friday, 21 July)
• RE: DITA Translation Subcommittee Meeting Minutes: 17 July 2006 (Friday, 21 July)
• Behavior for ITS elements in document instances (Monday, 10 July)
• RE: Proposed title change for the best practices document (Thursday, 6 July)
• Fixing example 24 (Wednesday, 5 July)
• Proposed title change for the best practices document (Wednesday, 5 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 September 2006 18:12:24 UTC