W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2006

[Bug 3469] Example 19 xml:lang

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:04:00 +0000
CC:
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1G1TtI-0002t6-Pv@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3469

           Summary: Example 19 xml:lang
           Product: ITS
           Version: LastCall
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ITS tagset
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: ysavourel@translate.com
         QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org


Issue #46 of i18nCore comments:
http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/

Section 5.6: Should this be identified by global rules as language information?
If not, we should explain why in the language information data category
section.

FS: The current definition 6.7.1. says "The element langRule is used to express
that a given piece of content (selected by the attribute langPointer) is used
to express language information as defined by [RFC 3066bis]." I would add a
note saying 

"Applying this data category to xml:lang attributes does not make sense since
xml:lang is already defined in terms of RFC 3066 or its successor". If that
would address your concern, please add it to your comment.

I18n: We propose a slight alteration to the above:

Applying the langRule data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules
is not necessary, since ...
Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 20:04:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:47 GMT