W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:10:58 -0600
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004601c6affc$89357840$9b05a8c0@Breizh>

> I'm not sure if the change really makes things clearer. Looking at other 
> vocabularies which require an URI data type, I don't find one with the
> *name* "URI". For example, HTML has the href attribute, XLink as well, ...
>
> should we really name the attributes after their data type, or isn't 
> naming after their function the common way? I am not sure if the term 
> URI is common enough for that purpose.

Good points.

-ys
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 15:11:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:08 UTC