W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri

From: Lieske, Christian <christian.lieske@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:20:52 +0200
Message-ID: <0F568FE519230641B5F84502E0979DD105736101@dewdfe12.wdf.sap.corp>
To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>

Very good points indeed.  

-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 17:11
To: 'Felix Sasaki'
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: RE: Exploring the change from Ref to Uri


> I'm not sure if the change really makes things clearer. Looking at
other 
> vocabularies which require an URI data type, I don't find one with the
> *name* "URI". For example, HTML has the href attribute, XLink as well,
...
>
> should we really name the attributes after their data type, or isn't 
> naming after their function the common way? I am not sure if the term 
> URI is common enough for that purpose.

Good points.

-ys
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 15:24:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:08 UTC