Hi all, I wonder if we should mark the language information data category as a feature at risk. At http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-definition , it says: [[The element langRule is used to express the language of a given piece of content. The langPointer attribute points to the markup which expresses the language of the text selected by the selector attribute. This markup MUST use values that conform to [RFC 4646] or its successor. The recommended way to specify language identification is to use xml:lang. ]] I am worried about the MUST: Will anybody provide implementations which process the value mentioned? If not, at least this MUST should be a feature at risk A - minor, but important - issue: I think we don't yet have the xml:lang declaration as part of the non-normative XML Schema and the generated DTD. In the XML Schema, we need s.t. like <xs:import namespace="the xml namespace" schemaLocation="schema which contains xml:lang declaration"/> . FelixReceived on Thursday, 28 September 2006 08:34:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:48 GMT